I
want to start a discussion about how we select our leaders. We don't
very often get the leaders we need, do we? I am just kicking some
ideas around I haven't really thought about it.
I
have met people in my local community who are better leaders than
those on the National stage. Some members of my family make more
sense than the ones we elect. What is going on?
The
way our system is set up it seems one would have to be super
ambitious to succeed in our electoral system. Are super ambitious
people the ones who will dutifully represent the people? Perhaps at
first, but in our money-driven political system will that loyalty
last?
When
it takes enormous amounts of money to get elected can the candidate
continue to represent the people?
I
think it is a mixed bag, some politicians are able to stay loyal to
the people despite temptations, others veer off to support other
agendas.
Do
the best qualified people ever contemplate running for office? By
qualified I am thinking about character, temperament, intelligence
and willingness to be of service.
Do
we teach civics in school to the extent that young people have a
grasp of the process? It seems that the world politicians occupy is
an alien world to the rest of us.
It
doesn't seem to me that politicians are doing what we would like.
Wouldn't most of us like some kind of economic security for everyone?
Wouldn't most of us want to be entitled to medical care the way we
are entitled to education? Speaking of education, don't we want free
education including college for everyone? None of these things are
unattainable, many countries in our Western World already have them.
Would
it be that difficult to end homelessness?
Some
politicians seem to rise up from the masses as if elevated by a
thousand hands and others seem to claw their way up. Do we have very
able leaders in the wings, as it were, hoping and waiting, without an
easy way in?
I
am going to be thinking about this. I will continue the discussion
soon.
Love
and Peace, Gregg
No comments:
Post a Comment